Page 10 - June-Month
P. 10

TECHNICAL PAPER


             220                                                    10
                                                                           As- uiltb
             200                                                    9
                                                                           FRP- trengtheneds
            er Hydraulic Jack (kN) 180                             Deflection (mm)  6 5 7
                                                                    8
             160
             140
             120
             100
            p  80                                                   4 3
            Load  60                As- uiltredictionb  p           2
                                    As- uilt xperimentalb
                                          e
              40
                                    FRP trengthened rediction-s  p
              20                                                     1
                                    FRP trengthened xperimental-s  e
               0                                                    0
                0    1   2    3   4    5   6   7    8   9    10        24  36  48  60  72  84  96 102 114 136 160 184 196
                          Vertical Deflection of Overhang (mm)                       Load per Hydraulic Jack (kN)
                   Figure 6(a): Comparison of load-deflection profiles  Figure 6(b): Comparison of deck overhang deflection at key load levels
           For the unstrengthened specimen, the predicted moment   beam was 8.73 mm, which indicates the rehabilitated specimen
           capacity of 117.2 kN-m found via moment curvature analysis   exhibited a 31.8% increase in deformation capacity over the
           was within 6.5% of the actual moment applied, 110 kN-m, of   as-built specimen with an increase in load of 72% per jack. In
           the structure at the max loading of 114 kN per hydraulic jack. It   addition to increasing the overall load and deformation capacity
           is noted that the use of ACI 318  [16]  results in a lower prediction   of the system, the NSM FRP strips act to increase the stiffness
           of moment capacity of 97.0 kN-m. As seen in Figure 6(a), the   and improve the stability of the system as can be seen from the
           predicted deflection values of the overhang compare well   increased stiffness and greater linear profile in Figure 6(a).
           with the experimentally measured deflections through the
           loading range, with the predicted deflection of 6.03 mm at the   It is instructive to further compare the behavior of the individual
                                                                  specimens in terms of deflections and cracking. The ultimate
           ultimate load of 114 kN per jack being only 5.2% less than the
           experimentally measured value of 6.36 mm. In the case of the   capacity of the as-built specimen was reached at an applied load
                                                                  of 114 kN per hydraulic jack, equivalent to a uniform distributed
           NSM FRP-strengthened specimen, predictions following ACI 440   load of 142.5 kN/m, which is 6.33x the nominal wall load. As
           and moment curvature analysis were 166 kN-m and 185 kN-m,   the loading of the edge of the slab was increased, the top
           which were within 12% and 2% of the experimental results,   layer of transverse reinforcement above the outer edge of the
           respectively. The predicted deflections for the overhang provide   stem yielded, followed by loss of aggregate interlock resulting
           good correlation till a load of approximately 160 kN/jack. The   in failure. Cracking was first observed on the top side of the
           over-prediction past this load is due to the assumption that full   overhang at the 84 kN load level per jack in the form of thin
           composite action is maintained for the section throughout the   discontinuous cracks which approximately followed the two top
           loading range, whereas experimentally, it was noted that there   longitudinal steel reinforcement bars adjacent to the edge of
           was a level of concrete cracking directly adjacent to the NSM   the stem wall, as shown in Figure 7(a), along with minor diagonal
           FRP after this load level.                             cracks along the exterior edge. Additional small cracks were
                                                                  observed with increasing load across the width of the specimen,
           The ultimate capacity of the NSM FRP strip-rehabilitated slab
           was reached at an applied load of 196 kN, equivalent to a   till the load reached 114 kN per jack at which point a large
           uniform distributed load of 245 kN/m. This ultimate capacity is   diagonal crack opened and quickly propagated along the width
           78% greater than that seen with the as-built specimen, which   of the overhang as seen in Figure 7(b). After the loading of the
           occurred at 114 kN per hydraulic jack, equivalent to a uniform   specimen was completed, loose concrete was removed in order
                                                                  to better observe the failure surfaces which are shown in Figures
           distributed load of 142.5 kN/m. At the failure load level, the as-  7(c) and (d). Some yielding of the rebar in the areas of the crack
           built specimen had a center deflection under the loading beam   was noted as well.
           of 6.36 mm, whereas the FRP-rehabilitated specimen deflected
           approximately half that of the as-built specimen, 3.33 mm. The   In comparison, the ultimate capacity of the NSM FRP-
           level of ultimate deflection of the unstrengthened specimen is   rehabilitated overhang was reached at an applied load of 196
           reached by the NSM FRP-strengthened specimen at a load level   kN per hydraulic jack, equivalent to a uniform distributed load of
           of about 170 kN/jack which is about a 49% increase in equivalent   245 kN/m. The first cracking observed in the as-built specimen
           capacity at that level. At ultimate capacity of the NSM FRP-  occurred at the load level of 84 kN, whereas the first set cracking
           rehabilitated specimen, the center deflection under the loaded   observed in the NSM FRP-rehabilitated specimen occurred at


        14    THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | JUNE 2021
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15