Page 10 - February-2022
P. 10

TECHNICAL PAPER


              Phase 2 mixes achieved very comparable compressive   [5]   de Larrard, F. (1999). “Concrete mixture proportioning:
               strengths to Phase 1 mixes, despite having substantially   A scientific approach”. Vol. 1. DOI: 10.1017/
               lower cement content; they also had reduced porosity,   CBO9781107415324.004.
               indicating the beneficial effect of powder packing.
                                                                  [6]   Holmes, M. S. (2018). Powder Packing Optimization for
              Relative to data collected for concrete of similar strength   Clinker Reduction in Concrete. MSc Dissertation. University
               class, results showed excellent binder performance in   of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
               terms of the binder efficiency index ‘bi’, with these values
               varying between 5.3 and 6.9 kg/MPa/m ; further reductions   [7]   Funk, J. E., and Dinger, D. R. (1994). Predictive process
                                              3
               in ‘bi’ are likely if water demand can be further reduced   control of crowded particulate suspensions.
               and SCM content increased.                             DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3118-0.
              There is a need to better understand the fundamental   [8]   Hunger, M. (2010). An integral design concept for
               influences of powder packing so that advances can be   ecological self-compacting concrete. Doctoral thesis,
               made towards a predictive process that incorporates    Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.
               indicators of practical usability (such as water demand and   [9]   Damineli, J. V. M., Quattrone, B. L., and Pileggi, R.G.
               expected workability) while maximising packing density.  (2018). “Fillers in cementitious materials - experience,
                                                                      recent advances and future potential”, Cement and
           REFERENCES
                                                                      Concrete Research, Vol. 114, pp. 65-78.
           [1]   Flower, D. J. M., and Sanjayan, J. G. (2007). “Green house   [10]  SANS5862-1:2006. South African National Standards.
               gas emissions due to concrete manufacture”, International
               Journal of Lifecycle Analysis  Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 282-288.   (2006). “Concrete tests - consistence of freshly mixed
                                                                      concrete-slump test”, South African Bureau of Standards
           [2]   Imbabi, M. S., Carrigan, C., and McKenna, S. (2012).   Pretoria.
               “Trends and developments in green cement and concrete
               technology”, International Journal of Sustainable Built   [11]  SANS5863:2006. South African National Standards. (2006).
               Environment, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 194-216.               “Concrete tests- Compressive strength of hardened
                                                                      concrete”, South African Bureau of Standards, Pretoria.
           [3]   Fennis, S. A. A. M. (2011). Design of ecological concrete
               by particle packing optimization. Doctoral Thesis, Delft,   [12]  Addis, B., and Goodman, J. (2009). “Concrete mix design”,
               Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.  In: G. Owens, ed. Fulton’s Concrete Technology. Midrand:
                                                                      Cement and Concrete Institute, Midrand, pp. 219-228.
           [4]   Yu, R., Spiesz, P., and Brouwers, H. J. H. (2015).
               “Development of an eco-friendly Ultra-High Performance   [13]  Damineli, B. L., Kemeid, F. M., Aguiar, P. S., and John, V.
               Concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral      M. (2010). “Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use”,
               admixtures uses”, Cement and Concrete Composites,      Cement and Concrete Composites. Vol. 32, No. 8,
               Vol. 55, pp. 383-394.                                  pp. 555-562.


                              MARK ALEXANDER is an Emeritus Professor and a Senior Research Scholar in the University of
                              Cape Town. He has a Ph.D. from the University of the Witwatersrand, and is a Fellow of the University of
                              Cape Town and of RILEM. He co-authored “Aggregates in Concrete” (2005), “Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
                              and Structural Damage to Concrete” (2011), and “Durability of concrete – design and construction” (2017)
                              (CRC Press) and was Editor of “Marine concrete structures. Design, durability and performance” (Woodhead
                              Publishers (2016). He is involved in (CoMSIRU) at UCT, which focuses on infrastructure performance and
                              renewal research. Email: mark.alexander@uct.ac.za


                              MATTHEW HOLMES graduated with a B.Sc. (Eng) Civil Engineering from the University of Cape
                              Town and went on to complete a M.Sc. (Eng) Civil Infrastructure Management and Maintenance with an
                              interest in the sustainable use of civil engineering materials. Email: holmes.matthew6@gmail.com







           Cite this article:  Alexander, M., and Holmes, M. (2022). “Powder packing optimization for clinker reduction in concrete”, The Indian
                         Concrete Journal, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 7-13.


                                                                           THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | FEBRUARY 2022  13
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11