Page 9 - November-2022
P. 9

TECHNICAL PAPER


           silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gels  [33]  also have moderate increase in   3.4  Pore structures
           the references at 365 days relative to the endothermic peak at
           90 days, which verifies highlighted rehydration occurred in UHPC   Figure 6 and Figure 7 furnish the pore size distributions
           pate.                                                  and porosity for UHPC pastes with long term water curing,
                                                                  respectively. In addition, its volume fraction of pores with
           Additionally, hydration product monocarboaluminate (MC)   different size ranges of pastes are presented in Figure 8.
           phase revealing synergism of MK and LS  [34]  can not be measured   According to Figure 6 and 7, the most critical diameter of MK
           distinctly in ternary paste blended with MK and LS (PLS15) in   blended mixtures are obviously smaller than that of the control
           terms of Figure 5(b). Moreover, its diffraction peak intensity of   pastes both at 90 and 365 days attributed to MK reaction. And
           Mc for LS cement mixture (PLS00) also has not distinct growth   the porosity of pastes without LS at 365 days has measurable
           at 365 days relative to the diffraction peak intensity at 90 days.   degradation compared with the porosity at 90 days. While
           Therefore, basing on the investigated results in this study, LS   the porosity of ternary paste CLS15 at 365 days presents an
           only serves as filler and it hardly participates in the rehydration   growth compared with the porosity at 90 days, which accounts
           reaction including synergistic reaction with MK in pastes with   for the slight degradation of compressive strength from 90 to
           long term water curing.                                365 days. In terms of Figure 8, pores under 10 μm of all pastes


























                              (a) Pastes without LS                                (b) Pastes blended with LS
                                       Figure 6: Pore size distribution of pastes under long term water curing


























                              a) Pastes without LS                                 ((b) Pastes blended with LS
                                            Figure 7: Porosity of pastes under long term water curing


                                                                           THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | NOVEMBER 2022  23
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14